Familicide Alleged After Chilling 911 Call

law enforcement officers gather at taped-off outdoor scene
Photo: a katz / Shutterstock

Police say a mother called 911 from a family resort, then was charged with killing her husband and toddler in the same room.

Story Snapshot

  • Pocono Township police charged Metallica Rose Harrison with two counts of criminal homicide.
  • Officers responded to a distressed-caller report at Great Wolf Lodge, room 2030, on October 12, 2026.
  • Court filings and officials say the victims were Harrison’s husband and their three-year-old son.
  • The case fits a rare category of family killings known as familicide, which occurs only dozens of times a year nationwide.

Police Account of the Resort Incident

Pocono Township Police reported a dispatch at about 3:13 p.m. on October 12, 2026, to Great Wolf Lodge in Scotrun, room 2030, for a distressed female caller. Officers identified the woman as Metallica Rose Harrison of Towanda. Police later charged Harrison with two counts of criminal homicide tied to the deaths of her husband and their three-year-old son. Officials said she would await arraignment before a magisterial district judge under Pennsylvania procedure.

Local outlets reported that Monroe County District Attorney Mike Mancuso discussed the double homicide charges during a press conference at the Pocono Township Police building the next day. Coverage named the victims as the husband, identified as Charles Harrison in some reports, and the couple’s three-year-old child. Reporters cited court documents and the criminal complaint as the basis for those details released by authorities at the time.

What Authorities Allege in Court Filings

Regional reporting summarized allegations from the criminal complaint that Harrison made the 911 call from the hotel room and described being in distress. Journalists who reviewed those filings said police accused her of stabbing both victims inside the room. While an arrest is not a conviction, the charges move the case into Pennsylvania’s court process where evidence is tested at a preliminary hearing after arraignment, under state rules for criminal cases.

Police and prosecutors have not publicly outlined a motive. Officials often hold back details to protect the investigation and any future jury pool. The district attorney’s office and police said they are continuing to gather evidence. The court will determine what information becomes part of the public record as the case moves from arraignment to preliminary hearing and, if bound over, to trial phases.

How This Fits a Rare but Documented Pattern

Researchers use the term familicide for killings that involve an intimate partner and one or more children. A national study estimated about 23 such incidents per year in the United States from 2000 to 2009, with most offenders being male and guns the most common weapon. That baseline shows how rare these cases are and cautions against assuming any single motive in a new case without direct evidence from investigators or court testimony.

Broader reviews across countries find repeated links to relationship breakdown, money stress, or serious mental health issues, but the data are limited and uneven. Those studies stress that each case turns on specific facts, not patterns alone. In this Pennsylvania case, authorities have not stated a motive, and the defense has not entered its arguments. The court process exists to test claims on both sides in public view and under rules meant to protect due process.

Sources:

pjmedia.com, crimewatch.net, wfmz.com, pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, tandfonline.com